|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
|
Research Systems & Architecture Bio & Medical |
Automated Characterization of Elastic Lamina (EL) Structures*Modeling of measurement of biological structures of blood vessel tissues is a basic procedure to research in the growth and remodeling (G&R) processes of the cardiovascular system under stress conditions, e.g., hypertension. The biological structures of the dissected blood vessel tissues taken from experimental subjects can be measured and characterized after they are imaged by a digital microscope. Understanding of these structural changes is essential to evaluation of disease conditions, and effectiveness of their medical treatments. Major challenges in characterization of the biological structures of the blood vessel tissue include (1) lack of standard reference coordinate system, (2) noisy images, and (3) labor intensive and error prone procedures. Most studies chose a sample area to assert the EL thickness. The image noise can be caused by the cutting procedure or non-optimal selection of the chemical dye. As a result, most study reported EL thickness results after the data are aggregated together. Although this practice maybe adequate for long term study, it may not applicable for the early development stage of hypertension, see the examples in figures 1 (a) and (b). For its complexity, many other biological structures were not considered in the current study.
Figure 1: a) Normotensive aorta and b) 4-week Hypertensive aorta Our lab is developing automated structural analysis tools [3] to extract
these parameters for automated characterization of
Experiment Result:To classify the input images into 2 classes: normotension and hypertension, we tested the LDA, PCA, Snapshot PCA, Feature Subset Selection (FSS), Quadratic Classifier and Linear Classifier. Based on the experiment outcomes, LDA with 15 selected features was used to generate the feature space. A linear classifier was used rather than conventional quadratic classifier with Gaussian kernel. Based on above models, our system is able to provide a 83.0% accuracy detection rate over 129 testing sample images, figure 3. ![]()
Figure 3: Aorta Sample Image Classification Results of a) Training Data, b) Testing Data Reference:
*A collaborative research effort with Dr. J. D. Humphrey of the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University |
||||||